The crescent & the cross: why Chrislam just won’t work

Crescent moon symbol of IslamThese are some general facts to compare Jehovah with Allah and Christianity with Islam since some believe them to be the same God and recent attempts try to marry the two in the race toward one world religion (Islam was established about 600 years after Christianity):

  • Allah, worshipped in pre-Islamic Arabia, is the god Muhammad’s Quraysh tribe worshipped.  Allah was the moon god who was married to the sun goddess and they had three daughters–Al-Lat, Al-Uzza, and Manat.  This is why we see the crescent moon symbol in conjunction with Islam.
  • Jehovah created the heavens (including the sun, moon, and stars) and the earth.  He has always existed and clearly prohibits the worship of the moon and sun (see Deuteronomy 17:2-5).
  • The prophet Mohammed gives conflicting accounts of how he received the Koran (Quran). In one account he says Allah came to him as a man who he saw with his own eyes to give him the Quran [Suras 53:2-18; 81:19-24]. In another account, Mohammed said the holy Spirit gave him the Quran [Suras 16:102; 26:192-194]. But he also said a group of angels gave him the Quran [Sura 15:8]. And, of course, he also said Gabriel the angel gave him the Quran [Sura 2:97].
  • The Bible tells us “20 Knowing this first, that no prophecy of the scripture is of any private interpretation. 21 For the prophecy came not in old time by the will of man: but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost,” 2 Peter 1. The whole Bible teaches non-contradictory doctrines by many men of God over thousands of years because God originated it. The Koran and the Hadiths that uphold it are private interpretations by man’s will, which contradicts how God operates. Furthermore, we are clearly told in Galatians 1:9, “As we said before, so say I now again, if any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.” And the teachings of the Quran contradict the Bible, making it another gospel.
  • Allah, according to Muhammad, is not trinitarian (Sura 5:73).
  • Jehovah is one God manifested in three persons.
  • Muhammad, who in his foolishness could not understand how God could physically have a son, denies Christ is the Son of God (Suras 6:100-101; 10:68; 19:35).
  • God’s word says Christ is the Son of God and was conceived in Mary, a virgin, by the power of the Holy Spirit. 1 John 2:23 says, “Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.”
  • The Koran says only white people will be saved on judgment day and black people will go to hell (Sura 3:106-107). The Hadiths, on which all Islamic laws and customs are based, portray Muhammad as a racist who hates blacks. He calls them “raisin heads” in Hadith vol. 1, no. 662 and vol. 9, no. 256. Muhammad said if one sees a black woman in his dreams, it is an evil omen in Hadith vol. 9, nos. 162 and 163.
  • The Bible says heaven has people of all nations, that anyone who believes in Jesus Christ is saved, and God is no respecter of persons (Acts 10:34-35; Revelation 5:9).
  • The Koran promotes violence against everyone who does not follow Allah (Sura 4:74, 89, 91).
  • Jesus told us to love our enemies and spoke against violence (Matthew 5:43-44; John 18:36).
  • The Koran says Muslims should stay away from people who don’t believe in their religion (Sura 4:89).
  • Jesus taught us to help our neighbors without regard for their background (Luke 10:27-37) and Paul implied it was ridiculous for Christians to snub unbelievers (1 Corinthians 5:9-13).
  • The false prophet Muhammad established the doctrine of “al-Taqiyya”, or “al Takeyya”, which is the idea of “concealing or disguising one’s beliefs, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions, and/or strategies at a time of eminent danger, whether now or later in time, to save oneself from physical and/or mental injury.”  This is the idea that it is okay to put on a false face or lie to your enemies as long as your heart does not change in devotion to Allah.  The tactic is used when Islamists want to present themselves as innocent and peaceful to their enemies in public, by doing social/cultural things accepted by their “enemies,” while in secret they are plotting the furtherance of Islam by various means, including violence or attempts to change cultures and laws of non-Muslims in plotting their downfall.  Even if they were to swear on a stack of Korans to do one thing, they are free to do the total opposite if it strengthens Islam.  The doctrine is taken from Sura 16:106–”He who disbelieves in Allah after his having believed, not he who is compelled while his heart is at rest on account of faith, but he who opens (his) breast to disbelief — on these is the wrath of Allah, and they shall have a grievous chastisement.,” (emphasis mine).  So they believe as long as your heart doesn’t change toward Allah, outwardly you can say or do anything to deceive your enemy.
  • Proverbs 6 tells us that Jehovah hates a lying tongue and false witnesses who speak lies.  Ephesians 4 commands Christians not to lie and to tell the truth to our neighbors.  Although there are places in the Bible where people of God mislead others, it is only done to preserve lives, not to destroy lives or violate human rights as is done in Islam.

If you would like more information about Islam, but don’t want to read the Koran, you can CLICK HERE and HERE for information compiled from various sources on Islamic doctrines and also an explanation of why Islamic leaders are so cozy with the Vatican.  Islam, whether considered “extreme” or not, is idolatry and is therefore evil.

–Harry A. Gaylord–

Brilliant plagiarists: the path to one world religion

one world religionAre all religions essentially the same? Do passages in the Bible match what appears in Buddhist, Hindu, Islamic, and other scriptures of other religions? If one were to listen to some religious leaders today, one would think so.

But these are false assumptions because they tend to overlook two important facts regarding the scriptures of non-Christian religions:

  1. Scripture writers of the false religions (non-Christians) reserve the right to go back and change the words and meanings of their scripture texts.
  2. Some of the changes made over time to their texts incorporated beliefs that the scribes encountered from Christian missionaries or God’s word which they thought were good philosophies to adopt as their own.

For instance, in Buddhism among the parables attributed to the Buddha are “The Widow’s Two Mites,” “The Lost Son,” “The Woman at the Well,” and “The Mustard Seed.” If you were to read them, you would find they are similar to, but not nearly the same as the incidents and parables mentioned in the New Testament.

An even closer examination of Buddhist writings reveals they were actually written AFTER the New Testament was complete. It is historical fact that the New Testament was preached in India and other parts of Asia before the end of the 1st century AD, so Buddhists would have encountered a Christian apostle and/or Christian missionaries before they wrote down the Buddha’s “teachings.” Additionally, the oldest known manuscript of Buddhist scripture dates back to the 1st century AD at the very time when Christians spread the gospel in Asia.

Hinduism teaches that the Vedas and other Hindu scripture are eternal, impersonal revelations of knowledge with no author. Therefore, the whole body of truth cannot be confined to written words. Scripture to them is merely part of the whole universal truth that has to be discovered over time. This leaves them open to accept “new revelation” from gurus and Brahmans at any given time which means if they encounter something they like from another religion or philosophy, it can be incorporated into Hinduism and scripture can be added, changed, or deleted accordingly.

Since Hinduism and Buddhism coexist in the same geographical areas (Buddhism was formed by disgruntled Hindus, after all), then Hindus were exposed to Judaism and, later, Christianity at the same time as Buddhists, so Hindu religious leaders took on some teachings from Jews and Christians, twisting them to conform to their traditions. Thus, in certain places in Hindu scriptures there are similarities, but they aren’t the same as what the Bible ultimately teaches.

Islam came on the scene 600 years after Christianity and the completion of the Bible, meaning that the Arab tribes had by this time heard all about the teachings of the apostles and prophets. The prophet Mohammed did not hide the fact that his teachings were meant to be an additional revelation to what the “people of the Book” had told him. So in the Koran, personalities from the Bible are mentioned quite often. But Mohammed often made the mistake of placing them in the wrong era from when they actually lived and changed their character, personalities, and stories to match his false doctrines.

Abdollah Sarh, one of the prophet’s followers, helped write parts of the Koran and began asking the prophet Mohammed if he could rephrase, add, or take out certain parts and Mohammed agreed. Then Abdollah realized that if the prophet were truly from God, the so-called revelations Mohammed was getting would have no need of being changed. He then turned against the prophet and went around telling others the revelations were false. Abdollah was eventually killed by Mohammed when he and his army raided Mecca.

All of this shows the lack of integrity that tends to go along with those who prop up false religion. It also reveals Satan’s ultimate goal for the end times. By placing bits and pieces of what appear to be Biblical teachings in all of his false religions, he can then prompt his ministers of unrighteousness to go out and brainwash the unenlightened by using those similar-sounding texts or ideas to do the ultimate bait and switch to get them to buy into his one world religion which proclaims that all religions lead to God. Then those deceived lost souls will find out the “God” they’re really talking about is the Antichrist, Satan’s protégé, and ultimately Satan himself.

They have seen vanity and lying divination, saying, The Lord saith: and the Lord hath not sent them: and they have made others to hope that they would confirm the word.

Have ye not seen a vain vision, and have ye not spoken a lying divination, whereas ye say, The Lord saith it; albeit I have not spoken?

Therefore thus saith the Lord God; Because ye have spoken vanity, and seen lies, therefore, behold, I am against you, saith the Lord God. Ezekiel 13

Harry A. Gaylord

Saudi cleric calls for the rape of Syrian girls, women

A popular Saudi Arabian cleric of the Wahhabi Muslims broadcast a religious command calling for jihadists fighting against President Bashar al-Assad in Syria to commit what amounts to rape. Muhammed al-Arifi told them they should take widowed or divorced women and girls who were at least 14 years old and put them in brief marriages lasting a few hours so they could have sexual intercourse.

Arifi said this would fulfill two purposes: (1) their sexual desires would be taken care of ; (2) it would help them to better concentrate and focus on taking out Assad’s regime.

And the push for a global caliphate marches on.

Source: Eretz Zen. Saudi Wahhabi Preacher Issues Fatwa Allowing Jihadis to Rape Syrian Women. Alex Jones’ Prison Planet. Prisonplanet.com. December 30, 2012.

Harry A. Gaylord

Mega-mosques are taking Western society by storm

Jalalia Jame mosque, UKThis week on his blog, Erick Stakelbeck examines the push for Muslims to put up more large mosques in areas throughout the Western Hemisphere. Those who speak against it are labeled islamophobes and racists by the media, the governments, and Muslim activists, but when one considers that the Saudi government in partnership with the Muslim Brotherhood are behind the new mega-mosques, the cause for concern is valid.

Great Britain is the perfect example of what happens with an influx of Muslims that comes with a mosque. Islamists use religious freedom as a ruse to impose their geopolitical system known as sharia which then is used to violate freedom of speech rights and religious rights of non-Muslims. And the new world order is more than happy to bend over backwards to let them do it.

The video at this link by Stakelbeck is approximately 30 minutes:
http://blogs.cbn.com/stakelbeckonterror/archive/2012/12/11/stakelbeck-on-terror-mega-mosque-madness.aspx

Harry A. Gaylord

Dr. Michael Youssef accuses the U.S. media of cowardice over Egypt

Michael_YoussefDr. Michael Youssef, the Egyptian American pastor & televangelist, is not very pleased with the coverage of what has been going on in his native country. The U.S. media has conveniently whitewashed the ultimate intentions of the Muslim Brotherhood who have been following their carefully laid plans all along to rise to power on the backs of those desiring real change in Egypt. Then once in power, they had always planned to do a bait and switch (baiting with democracy, switching to sharia) while duping the Obama administration into granting them their blessings.

Youssef said in his blog post today, “But Morsi is an Islamist, and the media fears the Islamists. And Morsi is President Obama’s ally, and the media loves the U.S. president. That leaves the protestors out in the cold with the TV cameras turned off. …

“The people of the West need to wake up from their slumber, follow the example of the Egyptian protestors, and rise up against the deliberate deception of the western media.”

That’s true. However, given the fact that the majority of the U.S. re-elected President Obama and appear to be content with what is going on in Washington, D.C., that may not happen any time soon.

Source: Michael Youssef. The Cowards and the Courageous. Michaelyoussef.com. Thursday, December 6, 2012.

Harry A. Gaylord

Barack Obama’s affinity to the Muslim world

During Barack Obama’s presidency, it has been interesting to watch his love/hate relationship toward Israel and how he has been apologetic and has shown deference to the Islamic world in many instances. Even in the recent uproar and murders of Americans in North Africa, his administration initially blamed everything on the film critical of the prophet Mohammed instead of acknowledging the obvious–the attacks were planned for a terrorist commemoration of the terrorist attacks of 9/11.

Why does the Obama administration have this mindset? To figure some of this out, you have to go back to Obama’s past in Chicago and his ties to left-wing foundations and the University of Chicago. In the 1990s up to his run for the U.S. Senate in Illinois, Obama was involved with the Woods Fund and became the chair of its board in 1998. The Woods Fund was a foundation that split from the Woods Charitable Fund, founded in the 1950s by Frank Woods who was a telephone company executive in Lincoln, Nebraska. The foundation was started to fund the arts and the civil rights movement. When the organization started using the bulk of its charitable donations for progressive/ultra-liberal causes, some members were disturbed by the trend and moved to split. Thus, the Woods Fund of Chicago was born.

The foundation was a huge supporter of ACORN, Jeremiah Wright’s church in Chicago, and Barack Obama’s community organization efforts in the 1980s and 1990s. During Obama’s time as a law professor at the University of Chicago in the 1990s, he became close friends with Rashid Khalidi, a professor who is Palestinian. Khalidi used to work for the PLO under Yasir Arafat as his adviser/press agent. As a member of the Woods Fund board, Obama helped steer over $100,000 to the Arab American Action Network, which is run by Khalidi’s wife. The Network is known for its anti-Israel stance and Khalidi has been outspoken about his hatred for Israel and his acceptance of terrorist attacks by Palestinians against Israel.

When Obama was running for the U.S. Senate, Palestinians in Chicago were skittish about supporting Obama because they weren’t clear on his views about Israel. Khalidi used his influence to persuade them to support Obama in an obvious quid pro quo and spoke highly of Obama at an Arab American Activist Network dinner in 2003–a dinner attended by Obama as well as his colleague William Ayers, formerly of the American terrorist group the Weather Underground.

So Obama’s childhood years in Indonesia are only part of the story of his mentality of wanting to, in some instances, mollycoddle or embolden people who have hated Western culture for centuries and who don’t want to change their centuries-old hatred. Thankfully, in the midst of the hatred and violence of the Muslim world, the Lord Jesus Christ is changing the hearts of many, drawing them from darkness to his glorious light.

Source: David Horowitz. The New Leviathan: How the Left-Wing Money Machine Shapes American Politics and Threatens America’s Future. [New York: Crown Forum, 2012] pages 32-34.

Harry A. Gaylord

Pastor Youcef Nadarkhani released from Iranian prison

The prayers of the righteous all over the globe have availed much. In a surprising turn of events, an Iranian court has ordered the release of pastor Youcef Nadarkhani from an Iranian prison. According to BosNewsLife, an Iranian court acquitted him of apostasy for abandoning Islam since he was never Muslim. They did find him guilty of evangelizing Muslims and sentenced him to three years, which amounts to time served.

He is expected to be released from prison on Saturday, September 8. Iran’s religious leaders are reported to have had a dispute amongst themselves over what should be considered apostasy and that dispute thankfully led to the final outcome for Youcef’s acquittal. Thank God for his movement in the affairs of men to preserve his children when he deems it necessary. This pastor’s refusal to convert to Islam under threat of death in prison has served to expand the church in Iran.

Source: Stefan J. Bos. Iran Orders Release Pastor Youcef Nadarkhani. BosNewsLife.com. Saturday, September 8, 2012.

Eating food offered to idols: a church celebrates Ramadan

A few years ago, I wouldn’t even be mentioning this because it wouldn’t have happened. A so-called “Christian” church is fixing meals for Muslims in Sacramento, California, to commemorate the month of Ramadan. Ramadan is a month of fasting during the day, then feasting at night with a meal called iftar.

So why is the church doing this? In the words of the church’s pastor, “We want to teach about the similarities in the Bible and Quran. There is too big a division today between Western society and the Arab world. …I believe that Jesus wants us to share his love.” If I didn’t know what godly unity was or what Jesus’ love was really about or what the Bible teaches, I would think that this endeavor was such a nice, sweet gesture. The pastor is basically pushing Chrislam, a new trend in the “emergent” churches that attempts to marry Christianity with Islam in the same way Constantine the Great married his Roman paganism to Christianity in the 300s AD.

Does the Bible actually address such a situation? Or am I just perturbed for no reason? Glad you asked. The writers of the Bible who ventured to the four corners of the globe to spread the gospel were surrounded by pagan cultures. They preached to pagans to convert them to the truth of God’s word. And with the conversions there were some controversies that arose, which Paul had to address in 1 Corinthians 8:4-13. When I was growing up, preachers usually fast forwarded through this passage since it never really happened because there was never talk of observing non-Christian holidays. But here’s the passage:

As concerning therefore the eating of those things that are offered in sacrifice unto idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one.

For though there be that are called gods, whether in heaven or in earth, (as there be gods many, and lords many,)

But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him.

Howbeit there is not in every man that knowledge: for some with conscience of the idol unto this hour eat it as a thing offered unto an idol; and their conscience being weak is defiled.

But meat commendeth us not to God: for neither, if we eat, are we the better; neither, if we eat not, are we the worse.

But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumblingblock to them that are weak.

10 For if any man see thee which hast knowledge sit at meat in the idol’s temple, shall not the conscience of him which is weak be emboldened to eat those things which are offered to idols;

11 And through thy knowledge shall the weak brother perish, for whom Christ died?

12 But when ye sin so against the brethren, and wound their weak conscience, ye sin against Christ.

13 Wherefore, if meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world standeth, lest I make my brother to offend.

The pastor of the First Covenant Church of Sacramento, Mark Shetler, is teaching false doctrine by celebrating iftar. He is teaching Allah = Jehovah, which is false. He is teaching there should be unity between the Lord Jesus Christ and those who do not believe Jesus Christ is Lord. He is teaching that sharing Jesus’ love means compromise to accept similarities with other religions. But God’s word, written by Paul, says the opposite. Shetler and his church are placing a stumblingblock in the path of the converts from Islam to the only spiritual truth there is, that Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life and no man comes to the Father but by him.

If a believer who was once pagan sees Christians participating in Ramadan’s iftar, and their understanding is that iftar is done to worship Allah, the convert is being told that celebrating Ramadan is fine. Then the convert may participate in Ramadan themselves all the while having in their mind they are honoring the false god Allah because their brothers and sisters in Christ said it’s okay. In doing so, the Christians have caused that convert to stumble and have defiled that convert’s conscience. Paul didn’t say this was sharing Jesus’ love. He said this would cause the weak brother to perish and is sinning against Christ [verses 11-12]. It shows that this church doesn’t care about lost souls or about what God wants, which is in opposition to Jesus’ love.

Source: Uzra Khan. Christian Church Cooks Ritual Ramadan Meal for Muslim Neighbors. HispanicBusiness.com. July 27, 2012.

Harry A. Gaylord

UN chooses Saudi Arabia to head counter terrorism unit

In a laughable turn of ironic events that can only happen at the United Nations, the UN has selected Saudi Arabia to take the lead in their UN Centre for Counter Terrorism (UNCCT). The UNCCT was started in 2010 to push for a global effort in the war on terrorism. The agency was established based on “four pillars” stating its purpose. Its first pillar calls for the UNCCT to counteract conditions that foster terrorism. However, Saudi Arabia has been proven to be the main nation sponsoring terrorism worldwide by funneling funds to al-Qaeda, Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, and others, as was pointed out in documents from Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that were leaked to Wikileaks.

Saudi Arabia also is a well known violator of human rights when the UNCCT has another pillar calling for the preservation of human rights. It sponsors an educational curriculum that teaches students to hate all other worldviews and religions besides Islam and sends Islamists to the West to teach those same views in mosques. Furthermore, they also foment hatred towards Israel and prepare Muslims under their influence to carry out jihad. To add insult to injury, Saudi Arabia is at the forefront of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation within the UN that has purposely caused a rift within a legal committee in the UN over what a working legal definition of “terrorism” is. Without a definition of terrorism, the UNCCT has no clear-cut way of knowing what it is combatting. Such is the nature of the UN. Those who hate human rights are given a lot of influence.

Read more here: Brooke Goldstein & Zack Kousnetz. Saudi Arabia to Lead UN Counter Terrorism Initiative. AINA.org. June 14, 2012.

Harry A. Gaylord

Silence on “destroy all churches” statement shows double standard

Since the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia called for the destruction of all churches on the Arabian Peninsula several weeks ago, there has been scant major media coverage of this incident. And no world leader had a press conference condemning the statement. All that could be heard were crickets chirping (with the exception of Turkey & Iran, who condemned the statement, but put into practice the idea behind the statement in their countries).  However, when a pastor in Florida burned the Koran and Afghans discovered that members of the U.S. military burned Korans, the media gave non-stop coverage to it worldwide and prominent world leaders fell over each other trying to be the first to get to a podium or camera to condemn the actions.

Such is the state of the world we live in. Cliff May of the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies has noticed the differences. He is of the opinion that world leaders, including the U.S., avoid speaking out when Muslims behave badly because they don’t want to be labeled Islamophobic. Saudi Arabia for decades has not only sought to destroy churches, they want to replace the free thinking Western Society with the religion of Islam and the geopolitical laws called sharia that go with it. Lest we forget, 15 of the 19 terrorists of 9/11 were from Saudi Arabia. And Saudi Arabia is leading the charge within the UN’s Organisation of the Islamic Conference to pass resolutions urging member nations to fight against the defamation of religions, i.e. forbidding anyone to criticize or speak ill of Islam in any way.

I believe all of this is a reflection of what goes on in the spiritual realm. Since our world is filled with principalities, and powers, rulers of darkness, and spiritual wickedness in high places, the majority of those in this world will prefer evil over good as we see time and again in God’s word. The Israelites preferred rulership by a human king over God’s judges (1 Samuel 8). The word of evil king Ahab was chosen over God’s prophet Micaiah (1 Kings 22). Inhabitants of Jerusalem during the final Babylonian siege listened to Azariah instead of Jeremiah (Jeremiah 43). The Jews chose Barabbas, the riotous murderer, over Jesus Christ (Matthew 27). And the Ephesian masses listened to Demetrius instead of Paul (Acts 19).

Sources: World Silent as Saudi Arabia Works to ‘Destroy’ Churches. CBNNews.com. Sunday, April 15, 2012.

Laura MacInnis. UN body adopts resolution on religious defamation. Reuters.com. Thursday, March 26, 2009.

–Harry A. Gaylord–

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 194 other followers