Dogs returning to their vomit: bad behavior of priests continues

catholic priest holding rosaryI came across two stories in the news today about Roman Catholic priests behaving badly. The first story covered a priest in Oregon who pleaded guilty to molesting a boy he invited to his house for a sleepover. Both the 47-year-old priest and the 12-year-old boy told authorities that the priest, Angel Armando Perez, gave him a beer while they watched movies.

The boy eventually fell asleep, but woke up later to find the priest fondling him while taking pictures of him with a cellphone. The horrified boy then ran from the house with Perez chasing after him. Neighbors came to the boy’s rescue and took the boy to his sister’s home.

Perez admitted he had been drinking heavily that night and claimed he didn’t remember what happened after the movie. He was arrested in August 2012 and charged with first-degree sexual abuse, DUI, furnishing alcohol to a minor, using a minor in a display of sexual conduct, and evidence tampering for deleting the explicit photos from his phone.

He pled guilty to the first three charges yesterday and prosecutors agreed to drop the last two charges. Perez was subsequently sentenced to serve more than six years in prison. The Archdiocese of Portland which employed him has had a history of sexually abusive priests and have paid tens of millions of dollars in restitution in the past.

Now we move from the Northwest to the Northeast for the second story. Roman Catholic priest Monsignor Kevin Wallin, 61, was indicted in January for taking part in a methamphetamine ring covering both the east and west coasts. He served in the Diocese of Bridgeport, Connecticut, until his suspension for sexual behavior toward other men. Many of the parishioners were shocked when the charges came out.

Not only was he a meth addict, but he was running an adult video store at the same time. He pled guilty today to the drug charges and agreed to serve 11-14 years in prison.

So why does this bad behavior continue in the Roman Catholic system all over the world? It’s because the whole system is corrupt and has been from its start in the 300s AD. Sure the RCC claims they are Christian and are founded on Peter the apostle, but they’re lying and their deeds prove it. Priests continue to have affairs with women, sleep with other men, molest children, get drunk, abuse drugs, and more because they are part of a pagan system which is of the world. The bad behavior is part of their culture. If they were truly part of God’s kingdom, such behavior would not be tolerated, covered up, and promoted in their ranks behind closed doors.

21 For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them.

22 But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire. 2 Peter 2

Harry A. Gaylord

Saudis attempt to bring all religions under one umbrella

Saudi Arabia is financing a new global initiative in Vienna, Austria to bring together all religions of the world for interfaith dialogue in an attempt to foster world peace. Yes, this is the same Saudi Arabia that persecutes Christians and does not allow freedom of speech especially regarding the preaching of the gospel. This is the same Saudi Arabia that covertly funds Islamists who preach violence against non-Muslims.

Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal, who spoke at the ceremony in Vienna, said “The thesis is valid that world peace cannot exist without peace between the world’s major religions.” The summit included government ministers from Austria, Saudi Arabia, and Spain. The new organization is dubbed “The King Abdullah Center for Interreligious and Intercultural Dialogue.”

In 2007, after Saudi King Abdullah visited Pope Benedict XVI at the Vatican, he came up with the idea of having such a center where Christians and Muslims could promote messages of peace to the world. That was followed in 2008 with an interfaith meeting in Mecca and another one in Madrid where Jews were invited. In 2009 in Vienna, all parties agreed on the basic setup of the organization.

Michael Spindelegger, Foreign Minister of Austria, stated the structure of the center makes sure that no religion dominates the organization and it remains open for membership to all interested nations. The organization will be governed by two Muslims (one Sunni and one Shiite), three Christians (one Catholic, one Anglican, one Orthodox), a Jew, a Hindu, and a Buddhist. It will also have 100 representatives that will include religious leaders, professors, and civic leaders of other faiths in addition to the faiths of the governing body.

This organization is one among many looking for “interfaith dialogue” which is code for one world religion. Another such initiative, the Tony Blair Faith Foundation, was started several years ago by the former PM of Great Britain. It’s interesting to note that the Vatican has a hand in all of them. It just proves that people without the mind of Christ are fulfilling what he prophesied centuries ago to their own spiritual detriment. It also means that the rapture of the true Christians is drawing closer and closer. Even so, Lord Jesus, come quickly.

11And I beheld another beast coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb, and he spake as a dragon.  12And he exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast, whose deadly wound was healed.  13And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men, 14And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles… Revelation 13

Sources:

Spencer Kimball. New international organization to bring world religions under one roof. Deutsche Welle. 14.10.2011.

Rob Kerby. Saudis underwrite organization to bring world’s religions under one roof. Beliefnet.com. October 14, 2011.

–posted by Harry A. Gaylord–

Scarlet harlot: aiding & abetting Antichrist

I discussed the origins and rise to power of the Antichrist in my previous post.  Now I’ll add a footnote, of sorts, to focus on who backs him in his lust to rule the one world government.  We find the most details about his supporter in Revelation 17 & 18.

Revelation 14:8 gives us the general prophecy that the whore, who is the great city spiritually known as Babylon, will fall.  In Revelation 17 & 18, an angel takes John on a tour to reveal who this whore is and to give details about her fall, as briefly mentioned in Rev. 14.

1…Come hither; I will shew unto thee the judgment of the great whore that sitteth upon many waters:  2With whom the kings of the earth have committed fornication, and the inhabitants of the earth have been made drunk with the wine of her fornication.  3So he carried me away in the spirit into the wilderness: and I saw a woman sit upon a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns.

 4And the woman was arrayed in purple and scarlet colour, and decked with gold and precious stones and pearls, having a golden cup in her hand full of abominations and filthiness of her fornication: 5And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. 6And I saw the woman drunken with the blood of the saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus… [Revelation 17]

Notice how the beast is red, having seven heads and ten horns, just like his spiritual father the dragon [Satan] in Rev. 12:3.  The great whore sits on the beast and we know that whenever a human sits on a beast, it means they have control over the beast.  This beast is the same as the one mentioned in Rev. 13, only this time he is scarlet.  He is full of the names of blasphemy because blaspheming God is what he lives for, as he himself claims to be God.

The whore wears purple and scarlet clothing with high end accessories to show off her wealth and to act as if she is royalty.  If we fast forward to see who this harlot is, we can then understand why she has what she does as she sits on the beast.

9And here is the mind which hath wisdom. The seven heads are seven mountains, on which the woman sitteth. …18And the woman which thou sawest is that great city, which reigneth over the kings of the earth. [Rev. 17]

The only city that reigned over the kings of the earth when Revelation was written is the city of Rome and it sits on seven hills, or mountains.   Several theologians have tried to argue against this, but the word of God is clear.  The same Rome that ruled the earth then still rules the earth now through the Vatican.  Rome never really went away as a world power, it just changed itself into the Roman Catholic system and sent their agents throughout the world to have a hand in the affairs of men, whether in government or the private sector, whether in putting leaders in power or taking them out of power, or in some cases, snuffing them out.  Through its Inquisitions and Crusades, it has shed more blood of Jews and Christians than any other organization on Earth.  I know the fact that I’m pointing this out upsets many people, but it’s the truth.

If you look at Roman Catholic leaders when they dress for special occasions in Vatican City or throughout the world, you will see purple and scarlet, gold, precious stones, and pearls.  The whore in Rev. holds a golden cup of abominations and filthiness because she has committed practically every abomination God said he was against in the Bible, from murder to fornication to sodomy to idolatry.

Do I hate Roman Catholics?  No, I don’t.  Jesus died for all mankind and loves all mankind.  But as a genuine Christian, it is my duty to “have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove [express disapproval of, correct] them,” [Ephesians 5:11].  I pray that those caught up in Roman Catholicism will see the light and come out of her.

She is called “MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH” because much of the evil things done in the Roman Catholic system are done in secret, its spiritual roots of seeking world domination and its idolatry go back to Nimrod and his tower of Babel which is how Babylon was founded, and she plays the harlot with shady back door deals–”bedding  down” with politicians and religious leaders and businessmen and criminals all over the world to glorify herself.  The Vatican is considered a nation whose religion is Roman Catholicism.

I will now give two major examples of how Rome has affected the world stage.  Rez Aslan, author of No god But God: The Origins, Evolution, and Future of Islam, admits in his book that Islam was founded to “Christianize” the Arabs.  What he didn’t point out is that Roman Catholicism in its quest to take over the world did not like the resistance of the Arabs to their religion.  So they recruited the prophet Mohammed through Khadija, his first wife, and worked with him on establishing a religion with a holy book and “visions” from God.  Then they could claim that followers of this religion are considered saved by Roman Catholic standards.  If you look at the Catechism, it says Muslims have salvation.

Karl Marx was a devout Catholic and the Vatican worked with him to come up with a government system where the government could own all of its citizens’ property.  He wrote his Communist Manifesto in 1848 under their tutelage and they gave us the communist/socialist system.  Is it any wonder why they both share a love for the color red?

If you read Rev. 18, it gives an extensive list on the commerce that takes place in Rome even today.  Verse 13 even says they trade in slaves and souls of men.  “Souls of men” speaks to how religion is used for their profit and the mention of slavery highlights why human trafficking is such a problem there today just as it was when Revelation was written.

At some point the beast and the ten kings who back him will tire of Rome and the Roman Catholic system [Rev. 17:16-17].  This is in spite of the fact that the Vatican helps bring the beast to power.  As I mentioned in my previous post, the Antichrist will double cross the leaders he has an agreement with.  Then God will use this as an opportunity to  destroy Rome along with Roman Catholicism and the beast with his 10 kings will look to Jerusalem as their new headquarters, setting the stage for the abomination of desolation.

Revelation 17: 8 and 11 tells us the beast was, and is not, and yet is.  This may be referring to the kingdom on which his belief system is based, which is the same system of the whore–Babylon.  Nimrod set up the original Babel to be the first one world leader. It became Babylon and he was worshipped by the people.  Every pagan system since has been based on the idolatry of the people of Babel who desire a man-god.  Nimrod became Baal, the sun god.  So this beast of Babel was [it existed in ancient times], and is not [the physical kingdom died out when God confused their language], and yet is [the pagan principles it established still exist].

10And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space. 11And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition. [Rev. 17]

This verse is talking about the most famous and powerful kingdoms to have existed.  The five that have fallen are Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Medo-Persia, and Greece.  The one that “is” existed during John’s time and continues today–the Roman Empire.  The other is not yet come because it is the one that Antichrist and his 10 kings will establish in the future, but it won’t last very long.  Nevertheless, Antichrist represents the remnants of the aspirations of the kingdoms that came before him and is therefore “of the seven.”

–posted by Harry A. Gaylord–

What my history class never told me about Lincoln’s assassination

When I was taught American history throughout grade school, Abraham Lincoln was one of my favorite people to learn about. Since his birthday is around the corner, I think this is the perfect time to share what I have learned about situations surrounding the conspiracy that led to his assassination. I, like so many other Americans, was always told the conspiracy to assassinate one of our best Presidents was because of anger over the South losing the Civil War.  However, my research shows Lincoln’s assassination was about much more than that.

This story begins with a Roman Catholic priest, a French Canadian named Charles Chiniquy.  In October 1851, Chiniquy met with the Roman Catholic Bishop of Chicago named Vandeveld who commissioned him to found a colony of Canadian Roman Catholic immigrants south of Chicago.  Their hope was to flood the state of Illinois with so many Roman Catholics that they could “rule the government of Illinois.”1  Accompanied by six citizens of Bourbonnais, Illinois, Chiniquy chose a site in southern Kankee County, Illinois.  The settlement, christened St. Anne, was founded by Chiniquy and his immigrant followers in November 1851.

However, Chiniquy became the object of jealousy from some of his priestly peers and they unleashed several plots to hinder the progress of his settlement.  The plots against him increased when his friend, Bishop Vandeveld of Chicago, resigned his post and was replaced as Bishop of Illinois by Bishop O’Regan.  O’Regan saw how beautiful Chiniquy’s 11 acres of land in St. Anne were and decided that he should have them, arguing that all land owned by priests of Rome belonged to the Church and should therefore be the property of the regional bishops.  Chiniquy refused O’Regan so O’Regan spread the word that he was looking to reassign Chiniquy to another area, but needed some justification for the move.

An evil land speculator named Peter Spink approached O’Regan in 1855 and told him he would gladly bring Chiniquy before a criminal court for fraud and theft if O’Regan would fund the suit.  O’Regan agreed and the suit came before the Kankakee criminal court in May of that year, but Spink lost the suit.  But refusing to be denied what he wanted, O’Regan encouraged Spink to bring another criminal suit against Chiniquy, and Spink lost again in November 1855.  However, Spink filed an appeal to the court in Urbana, Illinois for May 1856.2

This appeal prompted a stranger to approach Chiniquy to urge him to acquire the services of Abraham Lincoln.  The stranger told him “…I am a Catholic like you, and one who, like you, cannot bear any longer the tyranny of our American bishops.  With many others, I look to you as our deliverer. …Abraham Lincoln is the best lawyer and the most honest man we have in Illinois.”3

Chiniquy asked Lincoln for his help and Lincoln agreed to work with Chiniquy’s lawyers.  Along with Spink, O’Regan asked the priests Father Lebel and Father Carthuval from Chiniquy’s neighboring parishes to testify against Chiniquy because they too hated Chiniquy.  In May 1856, the trial was held and Abraham Lincoln poked holes in the lies these men told in court.  All the jurors, except one, wanted to find Chiniquy “not guilty” of all charges.  That one juror was an Irish Catholic who was told to vote against Chiniquy.  The jury was hung because of him and the jurors were dismissed.  Spink then asked the court to continue the prosecution and the court granted another trial set for October 1856.

While awaiting that trial, O’Regan made several attempts to get Chiniquy to quit his post, but Chiniquy refused.  And many Catholic parishioners throughout Illinois turned against O’Regan, signing petitions and writing letters to have him removed because of his greed and drunkenness.  At the trial in October 1856, Spink and the priests Lebel and Carthuval gave every kind of damaging perjured testimony they could against Chiniquy.  Lincoln was able to tear down many of their lies, but was doubtful the jury could easily dismiss enough of their testimony to find Chiniquy not guilty, so Lincoln urged Chiniquy, “The only way to be sure of a favorable verdict tomorrow is, that God Almighty would take our part and show your innocence!  Go to him and pray, for He alone can save you.”4

So that night, Chiniquy prayed and cried out to God from 11 pm to 3 am.  He got his breakthrough that night.  Lincoln knocked on his door at 3 am and gave him good news.  A witness came forward named Philomene Moffatt who related to Lincoln and gave sworn testimony that she witnessed firsthand the plot to destroy Chiniquy.  After reading the Chicago newspapers which predicted Chiniquy would surely be found guilty, Miss Moffatt took a train from Chicago to Urbana to tell everything she knew when she saw Spink and the priests concocting their schemes.

Later that day Spink dropped his suit and Lincoln gave his comments in court on how evil and upsetting the plot against Chiniquy was.  With the trial over, there was much rejoicing but it was soon overshadowed by another reality.  Chiniquy knew that things would not go well for Lincoln’s future because there were several high ranking Jesuits from Chicago and St. Louis in the courtroom who were clearly enraged at the turn of events and at Lincoln putting them to open shame in a public courtroom.  Chiniquy warned Lincoln to be careful and that he feared for Lincoln’s life, to which Lincoln replied, “I know that Jesuits never forget nor forsake. But man must not care how and where he dies, provided he dies at the post of honor and duty.”5

According to Chiniquy, papal Rome had always hated the U.S. because of our Constitution and the liberties that are guaranteed by it.  These liberties stand in the way of their quest for unfettered power over the masses.  So the destruction of America as a democratic republic has been one of its main goals.  When Abraham Lincoln ran for President, Rome was enraged and flooded the American media with all of the negative views they could muster against their enemy Lincoln.  Nevertheless, Lincoln became President in 1861.

The papacy then instituted a backup plan by urging the Southern states of the U.S. to secede and attack the North with devoted Catholic Jefferson Davis as their president.  The Pope was the only world leader at the time to recognize Jefferson Davis as leader of a legitimate government.  With the papacy promising to back their efforts, General Beauregard fired the first shot of America’s Civil War on April 12, 1861 at Fort Sumter.  This was the papacy’s chance to rid the world of the United States, or so they thought.

Chiniquy, having connections to Rome in the 1860s even though he had surrendered his life to Christ and had become Protestant, was able to uncover several plots by the Jesuits against President Lincoln and was able to warn him.  In the meantime, the Jesuits ran a campaign of misinformation in American newspapers by saying Lincoln was born Roman Catholic and was baptized by a priest.  Lincoln, of course, was never Catholic, but Chiniquy revealed to Lincoln that the reason behind the stories was that the canons of the Roman Catholic Church stated it was perfectly fine for any Catholic to murder anyone who had defected from the Catholic Church.  This was, in effect, a call for any Catholic fanatic to kill the President.

President Lincoln in his conversations with his friend Charles Chiniquy expressed how honored he was to be leader of the U.S., what a privilege it was to be able to free millions of slaves in the same way Moses led the Hebrews to freedom, how he loved the Lord Jesus and his word, and like Moses, how he knew he would not be able to see the Promised Land.  In spite of what Lincoln knew would be his impending death, Chiniquy saw that Lincoln was at peace.

After Lincoln’s assassination, Chiniquy compiled facts from the trials of the conspirators and other information to show how the Jesuits put Lincoln in their cross-hairs.  The Jesuits met often at the house of Mary Surratt and were the friends and confessors of the Surratts and John Wilkes Booth, who were all Catholic.  Dr. Mudd who tended to Booth’s broken leg and Richard H. Garrett, who hid Booth in his barn, were also devout Catholics.  At their trials, the conspirators admitted the Jesuits trained them not only to kill, but how to perjure themselves.  It was also brought out that Jefferson Davis promised them a million dollars to kill Lincoln.

Before his death, Booth wrote: “I can never repent, though we hated to kill.  Our country owed all our troubles to him [Lincoln], and God simply made me the instrument of his punishment.”6

Although the conspirators in their testimonies admitted religious reasons for their conspiracy, all mention of religion concerning the conspiracy has been erased from the history books in America.

…yea, the time cometh, that whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service. [John 16:2]

–posted by Harry A. Gaylord–

1. Chiniquy, Charles. Fifty Years in the Church of Rome. Abridged ed. Chick Publications, 1886, reprint 1985, p. 214.

2. Ibid., p. 261.

3. Ibid., p. 262.

4. Ibid., p. 275.

5. Ibid., p. 281.

6. Ibid., p. 309.

Shroud of Turin still shrouded in controversy

The Shroud of Turin, which was discovered in the mid-1300s in Troyes, France, is once again on display from April 10-May 23, 2010 in Turin, Italy after a decade of absence from the public eye. It is touted as being the burial cloth of Jesus Christ by many Christians, pseudo-Christians, and some scientists. In 1898, the Shroud became an international phenomenon when photographer Secondo Pia produced a photographic negative of the Shroud that revealed an image of a man that is believed to be an image of Jesus Christ himself.

Scientific tests were done in 1988 on the 14.3 by 3.7 ft. piece of cloth using radiocarbon dating with results showing it originated between 1260-1390. However, those results are disputed by many who question the way the radiocarbon dating was done or who question the validity of radiocarbon dating itself. There are no concrete explanations as to how the image got on the cloth since no one has come up with a way to copy the Shroud. Without any slam-dunk scientific evidence to completely validate the Shroud’s authenticity, the Shroud continues to be shrouded in controversy of whether or not it is genuine.

My personal opinion is that the Shroud of Turin is a fraud and an elaborate hoax. The fact that no one has ever discovered Christ’s body and no proof exists to dispute his resurrection is good enough for me to accept the fact that Jesus rose from the dead, just as he predicted he would. Then there is also the fact that secular historians from the 1st and 2nd Centuries as well as the findings of modern archaeology show the New Testament recorded events with a great deal of accuracy, proving that the New Testament is totally reliable.

So we must ask ourselves what the big deal is about the Shroud of Turin anyway? To answer that question, I will first point out that the Shroud is in the possession of the Vatican. When one looks at the true history of Roman Catholicism (and by that I mean the history that has not undergone their revisionist lies), one will discover that those who lead this church have always used sleight of hand to deceive people into believing that devotion to their organization is the only way to be godly. Displaying the Shroud of Turin is very much like a Marian apparition in that it is being used as a PR move to try to soften much of the negative press the Vatican has gotten lately for covering up the overwhelming problem of pedophile priests in Roman Catholicism.

I base this on what the Archbishop of Turin, Severino Poletto, has stated: “The Church has always gone through painful times in the course of history. Those who point the finger at a few priests forget to say how much good the Church and its institutions have done for humanity throughout history.” So I guess we can just forget about the lives that have been devastated by perverted priests (and there are more than just a few, contrary to what he states) since the Roman Catholic Church has piled up enough good works to outweigh their perversions.

Poletto then went on to quote Pope John Paul II who said the Shroud is a reminder of “millions of men who die of hunger, of the horrors perpetrated in so many wars (and) the brutal exploitation of women and children.” But of course by making this quote the late pope conveniently overlooked that many priests and undercover Jesuits have perpetrated wars and advanced the brutal exploitation of women and children in their personal lust and lust for world power.

If we look at what the Bible says about the burial cloths of New Testament times, we can see the possible fraudulence of the Shroud. As John Adolfi of the Lost World Museum recently pointed out in his April 2010 newsletter, the burial custom of the Jews was to have bodies wrapped in strips of linen, which included at least two pieces–one to wrap around the head and another piece to wrap the body. In other words, they looked like mummies. Here’s what the Scriptures say about the Jews’ burial practices:

43And when he thus had spoken, he cried with a loud voice, Lazarus, come forth.44And he that was dead came forth, bound hand and foot with graveclothes: and his face was bound about with a napkin. Jesus saith unto them, Loose him, and let him go.  [John 11]

————

38And after this Joseph of Arimathaea, being a disciple of Jesus, but secretly for fear of the Jews, besought Pilate that he might take away the body of Jesus: and Pilate gave him leave. He came therefore, and took the body of Jesus.39And there came also Nicodemus, which at the first came to Jesus by night, and brought a mixture of myrrh and aloes, about an hundred pound weight.

40Then took they the body of Jesus, and wound it in linen clothes with the spices, as the manner of the Jews is to bury.  [John 19, emphases added]

————-

3Peter therefore went forth, and that other disciple, and came to the sepulchre.4So they ran both together: and the other disciple did outrun Peter, and came first to the sepulchre.

5And he stooping down, and looking in, saw the linen clothes lying; yet went he not in.

6Then cometh Simon Peter following him, and went into the sepulchre, and seeth the linen clothes lie,

7And the napkin, that was about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself.  [John 20, emphases added]

So the scriptures tell us they were graveclothes and linen clothes, meaning more than one piece of cloth.  Since the Shroud is all one piece, it does not match the scripture and can therefore be dismissed from having anything to do with the Lord Jesus Christ.

Source: Gina Doggett, Shroud of Turin displayed for first time in decade, Yahoo! News, Saturday, April 10, 2010.

–posted by Harry A. Gaylord–

Israel’s Peres wants Vatican to have “Christian” sites

Shimon Peres, Israel’s president, has openly expressed his wishes that the so-called “Christian” holy sites in Israel be handed over to the Vatican, according to a report appearing in the May 4, 2009 Jerusalem Post.  Many officials in the upper eschalons of the Israeli government have expressed their concern and opposition to such an idea, including the Interior Minister, Eli Yishai.

David's TowerYishai, as quoted in the Jerusalem Post, believes “Every concession like this limits the Israeli government’s ability to function as a sovereign government in the area.”  Peres is attempting to use his influence within the government to give up six sites, for now.  Those sites include the Coenaculum on Mount Zion, the Church of the Annunciation in Nazareth, the Church of the Multiplication on the Kinneret, and the Church of the Annunciation in Nazareth.Jerusalem's Golden Gate

Although many Israeli politicians oppose the idea, some officials are open to the idea and are attempting to weigh the benefits such a move would bring to the economy.  They believe that if the sites are given over to the Vatican, many more “Christian” pilgrims would come to visit the sites from all over the world, which would boost Israel’s treasury.

As students of history are aware, it wasn’t too long ago that the Vatican refused to acknowledge Israel as a nation.  That all changed in the late 1950s and early 1960s when it was discovered that the bones of Peter that the Vatican claimed to have found in Rome were really not Peter’s bones at all.  Peter’s grave was discovered in Jerusalem during that time and ever since the Vatican has been moving to warm their relations with Israel through Vatican sympathizers in the Israeli government.  Since their church is founded on Peter instead of the true rock, Jesus Christ, they feel that it is imperative that they set up headquarters wherever Peter’s bones are.  Persuading Israel to give up some land would be the first step in that direction.

The Vatican’s desire for Israeli land, in my opinion, will end up being part of the peace covenant that will ultimately be established by the Antichrist and Israel will, in the peace process, once again have a temple.

But as far as these sites are concerned, neither Jesus Christ nor his apostles ever gave us any commandments or a hint of a suggestion that Christians should commemorate any holy sites by having pilgrimages.  Jesus told the Samaritan woman in John 4 that true worship is to be done in spirit and in truth.  It has nothing at all to do with a physical place.  However, those caught up in a works-based salvation (which has nothing to do with the genuine gospel) consider pilgrimages important for the purpose of spending less time in purgatory (which doesn’t exist) or with the hope they will get on God’s good side for a greater reward in the afterlife.

–posted by Harry A. Gaylord–

Apparitions or aberrations?: the immaculate deceptions of “Virgin Mary”

The Roman Catholic church is quite crafty in its dealings both politically and religiously all over the world, whether it’s out in the open or behind the scenes.  Because of their craftiness, they have been able to deceive millions into submitting to their false system of beliefs and political aspirations.

One tool they often use to market themselves are apparitions and miracles concerning their version of Mary.  These apparitions have their roots going back to the ancient legends regarding Semiramis and her husband Nimrod.  When Nimrod died, he was called Baal, the sun god.  Semiramis (who called herself the moon goddess) gave birth to their son Tammuz after Nimrod’s death and ancient artworks were made depicting her holding her son, with halos over their heads.  These artworks were then Christianized by Roman Catholicism to portray the virgin Mary and baby Jesus. 

Semiramis was called the “Queen of Heaven” and became Mary after she was ”Christianized.”  The Vatican with Satan’s help set about to cause appearances of this Mary to be made in various places throughout the world in order to win converts to their Roman Catholic system.  The Bible says Satan and his angels can transform themselves into angels of light (2 Corinthians 11:14-15) and this power of deception is what the Vatican uses to cause weeping statues and apparitions of Mary to occur.  In order to relate to those who witness these “miracles”, the spirit may appear as whatever race the person is.  Each pagan system, including Roman Catholics, have assigned her a name specific to their man-made religion whether it’s Isis, Diana, Venus, Ishtar, Ashtoreth, the Madonna, Our Lady of Guadelupe, or Our Lady of Fatima.

In the vision of Fatima, Mary prophesies that Russia will follow Roman Catholicism if those who believe in her will pray for peace.  This political maneuver by the Vatican is meant to get as many Russians as possible to convert while the leaders in the Vatican work their power plays with the Russian government behind the scenes.  Since Fatima is also the name of the false prophet Muhammad’s daughter, the vision’s second goal was to broker alliances with Muslims by claiming the vision was of his daughter who Muhammad said “is the most holy of all women in Paradise, next to Mary.”

Whenever the Vatican needs a public relations boost is usually when these apparitions occur.  In recent years, Roman Catholicism has suffered because of the sexual misconduct of its priests, so don’t be surprised when these apparitions pop up to deceive people into clinging to this spiritually bankrupt politico-religious system. 

God’s word gives us several warnings when it comes to prophesies and miracles such as these:

(Deuteronomy 13)

1: If there arise among you a prophet, or a dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder,
2: And the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spake unto thee, saying, Let us go after other gods, which thou hast not known, and let us serve them;
3: Thou shalt not hearken unto the words of that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams: for the LORD your God proveth you, to know whether ye love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul.
4: Ye shall walk after the LORD your God, and fear him, and keep his commandments, and obey his voice, and ye shall serve him, and cleave unto him.
5: And that prophet, or that dreamer of dreams, shall be put to death; because he hath spoken to turn you away from the LORD your God…  

(Deuteronomy 18)

20: But the prophet, which shall presume to speak a word in my name, which I have not commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in the name of other gods, even that prophet shall die.
21: And if thou say in thine heart, How shall we know the word which the LORD hath not spoken?
22: When a prophet speaketh in the name of the LORD, if the thing follow not, nor come to pass, that is the thing which the LORD hath not spoken, but the prophet hath spoken it presumptuously: thou shalt not be afraid of him. 

Mark 13:22 For false Christs and false prophets shall rise, and shall shew signs and wonders, to seduce, if it were possible, even the elect.

(Revelation 13)

13: And he [the false prophet] doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men,

 14: And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.

Sources:

The Force, Ontario, CA: Chick Publications, 1983, pp. 9-11.

The Prophet, Ontario, CA: Chick Publications, 1988, pp. 26-28.

–posted by Harry A. Gaylord–

Sweet deceptions: Catholicism and Christianity blow-by-blow

Contrary to what is commonly taught concerning the founding of Roman Catholicism, Peter was not the first pope or founder.  The Catholic Church was started by the Roman Emperor Constantine the Great in 337 A.D.  As he witnessed the weakening of the Roman Empire and how it was divided into paganism vs. Christianity, he devised a religious system that he thought would combine the two in order to save the empire.  He took the pagan Roman gods and goddesses and renamed them with the names of New Testament biblical saints and proclaimed he had converted to Christianity.  In secret, he continued his worship of the sun god Sol (better known as Baal).  He welcomed both pagans and Christians into his new religion and the Roman Empire was rebirthed as the Holy Roman Empire.  True Christians refused to fall for the deception and continued to be persecuted, but many of them went into hiding.  Here are some of the beliefs held dear by Roman Catholicism compared to God’s truth:

  • Roman Catholicism teaches that Peter was the rock on which the church was built based on Matthew 16:18-19.
  • The true rock upon which the true Christian church is built is Jesus Christ.  Jesus actually said, “That thou art Peter (Petros, a small stone or pebble), and upon this rock (petra, a huge boulder or bedrock) I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.”  This was said to Peter by Jesus to address the confession that Peter made about Christ in Matthew 16:16.  We have a second witness of what the name Peter means in John 1:42–”And when Jesus beheld him, he said, “Thou art Simon the son of Jona: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone [a pebble].”  Peter even calls Jesus the rock, or petra, in 1 Peter 2:8.
  • Roman Catholicism teaches that their traditions are equal to the holy scriptures (Catechisms 80, 82).
  • Jesus said the traditions of men cause the transgression of God’s commandments (Matthew 15:2-6).  Paul even rebuked the believers at Colossae for subjecting themselves to religious ordinances established by men (Colossians 2:20-23).
  • Roman Catholicism says the priest has the power at mass to turn the wafer and wine into the actual body and blood of Christ (transubstantiation), thereby sacrificing Christ over and over, which would mean Christ’s sacrifice was no different than the Old Testament sacrifices under Mosaic law that had to be sacrificed over and over.  Anyone who denies transubstantiation and refuses the eucharist is accursed and is therefore worthy to be put to death (Canon 1 of the Council of Trent, 1563).
  • Hebrews 10:10, 14 says it was only necessary for Christ to die once for everyone and through the one-time offering of his life, those of us who believe in him are sanctified and perfected (made complete).  Taking communion is taken in remembrance (as a memorial) of Christ’s sacrifice (1 Corithians 11:24, 26).  1 John 3:15 says murderers do not have eternal life, so a genuine Christian will not actively seek someone’s death who disagrees with him.
  • Catholicism teaches that only the Pope and his bishops can interpret the scriptures (Catechism 100).
  • The Bible teaches us that the Holy Spirit in every believer teaches us the meaning of the scriptures and it is not necessary for us to depend on men to do this for us (1 John 2:27).
  • Catholic Catechism 491 states that Mary never sinned.
  • Romans 3:23 says all have sinned and come short of God’s glory.  2 Corinthians 5:21 names Jesus Christ as the only one ever who knew no sin.
  • Catholics teach that Mary is the mother of God (Catechism 495).
  • The Bible states Mary is either called the mother of Jesus or “the mother of my Lord” by Elizabeth, which was just her way of acknowledging she would give birth to the Messiah.  God, since he is eternal, has no mother.  Jesus also said “For whosoever shall do the will of God, the same is my brother, and my sister, and mother.” (Mark 3:35), thereby discouraging any deification of Mary.
  • Mary remained a virgin, according to Catechism 966.
  • Matthew 1:25 says Joseph knew (had sexual relations with) Mary after Jesus was born.  According to Matthew 13:55-56, Jesus had four literal half-brothers and several literal half-sisters.
  • Catholicism secretly teaches that all non-Catholics are heretics and that it is not a sin to kill them since it is God’s will for them to be wiped off the face of the earth because they want to destroy the Church. (Council of Trent)
  • The Bible says murder is sin, without exception, and that murderers will ultimately burn in the lake of fire (Revelation 21:8).  True Christians are taught to love our enemies and do good to them.
  • “The Roman Pontiff judges all men, but is judged by no one.  We declare, assert, define and pronounce: to be subject to the Roman Pontiff is to every human creature altogether necessary for salvation… That which was spoken of Christ… ‘Thou hast subdued all things under his feet,’ may well seem verified in me.  I have the authority of the King of kings.  I am all in all and above all, so that God, Himself and I, The Vicar of God, have but one consistory, and I am able to do almost all that God can do.  What therefore, can you make of me but God?”–Pope Boniface VIII in his Bull Sanctum, November 18, 1302. (Note: This declaration has never been rescinded or denied by any Pope who came after Boniface VIII)
  • 2 Thessalonians 2:4 says anyone who shows himself to be God or claims to be “above all” is antichrist.
  • Catholicism states that salvation is only through their church and can only be received if one fulfills their sacraments (Catechisms 846, 1129).
  • True Christianity teaches that only grace through faith in Christ, not religious works, can save.  Once a person confesses that Jesus Christ is Lord as a result of believing in their heart that he rose from the dead on the third day, he is saved and his salvation, if genuine, will result in works (Romans 10:9-10; Ephesians 2:8-9; James 2:17-26).

I think it’s clear that the doctrines of true Christianity and the doctrines of the false Christianity of Catholicism are diametrically opposed.  For more on the false doctrines of Roman Catholicism, click here.

Ungodly crusaders

The Crusades started in the 11th century and lasted until the 14th century.  The goals of the wars were to take the Holy Land from Muslim control and preserve it from Muslim incursions.  Seljuk Turks had taken control of Jerusalem in the 11th century and were threatening to overthrow the Byzantine empire.  Also, these Islamic Turks were harassing and persecuting Roman Catholics in their pilgrimage to visit the Holy Sepulcher where Christ had been buried.  So because of the complaints of the pilgrims and the Byzantine emperor asking for help, Pope Urban II amassed his army.  Let’s examine the facts to see if the wars were truly Christian.

  • The Vatican wanted to preserve the pilgrims’ journey to the Holy Sepulcher (tomb), which was part of their penance (a work done to absolve an individual of sin).  Those who took up arms to protect the sepulcher were promised full penance for their deeds.
  • The only payment for sin, according to the holy scriptures, is Christ’s sacrificial death (1 Corinthians 15:3) not our works.  Only Jesus Christ can forgive our sins (Ephesians 1:7), not a sinful man with a lofty title.
  • The papacy during this period had been weakened and the Pope saw this as an opportunity to strengthen his office.  He was puffed up in his pride.
  • According to the scriptures, God resists the proud but gives grace to the humble (James 4:6).  Jesus said whoever exalts themselves will be humbled and those who humble themselves will be exalted (Luke 14:11).
  • The Vatican wanted control of Jerusalem because of its religious importance in history as a place of worship and because the apostle Peter is buried there.
  • Jesus said the hour has come when worshipping the Father is not about whether one worships in Jerusalem or on Mt. Zion, but that we worship him in spirit and in truth (John 4:21-24).
  • The kingdoms from which the crusaders came wanted to expand their territories to increase their wealth and influence, claiming they were doing it for the glory of God.  They were covetous.
  • Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.” (John 18:36).  Colossians 3:5 tells us that covetousness is idolatry.
  • During these campaigns genuine Christians, Jews, and Muslims were all massacred by the crusaders and their women were raped.  The children who were born from the rapes were sold into slavery to Muslims.  They also killed fellow Roman Catholics who did not agree with their bloodshed.
  • Jesus commanded us to love our enemies and to do good to those who hate us or despise us (Luke 6:27-28).  The word of God tells us that no murderer has eternal life abiding in him (1 John 3:15). 

I believe the record shows us clearly that the crusaders were not really Christian.  They claimed to know God but by their very abominable, disobedient, and reprobate actions they denied him (Titus 1:16).  It is because of their evil doings that the way of truth has been evil spoken of (2 Peter 2:1-2).  I am sorry that those who suffered at their murderous hands thought these men represented Christianity.  I am also sorry that their modern day descendants think the same.  True Christians love and do not jump at the opportunity to physically hurt people.  We share the true gospel through preaching and by our lifestyles, not by brute force.

–posted by Harry A. Gaylord–

The pot calls the kettle black, or, people who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones

The Associated Press reported a few days ago that Catholic leaders denounced New York City’s campaign of distributing free condoms.  Part of their official statement states, “Our political leaders fail to protect the moral tone of our community when they encourage inappropriate sexual activity by blanketing our neighborhoods with condoms.”  They then called Mayor Bloomberg’s administration hypocritical for acknowledging abstinence as 100% fool-proof against sexually transmitted diseases yet at the same time giving out prophylactics.

I think it’s ironically amusing and at the same time sad that a religious organization that for decades has kept secret the sexual sins of priests who have trysts with each other and as many altar boys as they can get their hands on, would then turn around and call Bloomberg’s administration hypocritical.

“And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but perceivest not the beam that is in thine own eye?

“Either how canst thou say to thy brother, Brother, let me pull out the mote that is in thine eye, when thou thyself beholdest not the beam that is in thine own eye? Thou hypocrite, cast out first the beam out of thine own eye, and then shalt thou see clearly to pull out the mote that is in thy brother’s eye.”  (Luke 6:41-42)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 180 other followers